PA SUPREME COURTS ALLOWS DEFAULT TO STAND AGAINST BANK OF AMERICA

As an update to a blog I posted in January, 2014, in which I discussed a default judgment I secured for my client against Bank of America, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court just ordered that the default judgment shall remain in place. I filed a lawsuit against Bank of America in Delaware County, PA for predatory lending and unfair trade practices. The bank failed to answer the lawsuit and I moved for a default judgment. Of course, the bank appealed, asking the trial judge to allow it to file an Answer, but the trial judge refused. The bank unsuccessfully appealed to the Superior Court and then to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, also unsuccessfully.

This means that the case can now proceed to a jury trial to determine the amount of my clients’ monetary damages. Certain discovery issues need to be worked out; primarily I am in the process of securing testimony from a Bank of America Corporate Representative regarding the net worth of the company in 2012 and 2013.

This is because I included a claim for punitive damages, which are used to punish the defendant for wrongful conduct. One of the ways that a jury is allowed to and able to determine an appropriate dollar amount for damages is to consider the net worth of the defendant. The Bank is, of course, objecting to such an inquiry, and is not agreeing to produce such a representative; again, the trial judge will decide the scope of the deposition testimony. I am hopeful for trial in January/February 2015. I will keep you posted.

Contact the law firm of Shaffer & Gaier, LLC

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

THE ELUSIVE HOUSING RECOVERY

With all the happy talk recently about the nation’s housing recovery, much of eastern Pennsylvania and central and southern New Jersey real estate markets still have a significant amount of homes that are underwater (when the mortgage balance is greater than the value of the home). Many of these properties were purchased or refinanced by homeowners during the housing bubble which collapsed in 2007.

Recent reports continue to suggest that the best solution for all parties (banks, homeowners, investors, states and municipalities) is for the approach of “principal reduction.” By this method, if lenders rewrote the loans to reflect fair market values, then owners would have lower monthly payments which would put more money and tax dollars into local economies. Cities and towns could have more stable property tax revenues and lenders may ultimately benefit by having fewer delinquent loans.

The solution is not so simple because many banks no longer own the loans they made. Many of the underwater home loans have been pooled into private securities, and sold off to investors. The companies who service these securities and loans generally will not reduce the principal because, since they do not own the loan, they do not have the authority to reduce the principal balance. With all the talk over the last 12 to 18 months about settlement agreements between the Justice Department and the big banks, none of these initiatives require the banks or their investors to reset loans as a condition of getting Federal funds. Even the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) has helped barely 25% of the 4 million homeowners it was supposed to reach. Worse still, the Federal Government itself is an obstacle to a lot of the reform measures because the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, will not allow these two mortgage giants to reduce the principal on any of the underwater mortgages they own or guarantee. The new FHFA director, former-Representative Melvin Watt, could change that policy and he could do it without Congressional approval. It remains to be seen if the Administration will embark on principal reduction.

Contact Our Office

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

Now Lenders are Being Extra Careful

During the mortgage lending boom in the middle of the last decade, prospective loan originators and mortgage brokers would lend money to almost anyone, whether the perspective homeowner had sufficient income to pay the loan back or not. In recent days, however, lenders are risk-averse, and they are demanding detailed documentation for all areas of the applicant’s financial status and background. Borrowers should be prepared to answer questions about gaps in their employment, pending lawsuits and even divorce proceedings.

There is, however, a limit to how much personal information can be requested. Questions about whether an applicant is pregnant are prohibited under federal law, but lenders have figured ways of getting around those delicate (and unlawful) inquiries. For instance, the lender may ask a young woman, applying for a mortgage on her own, whether she has any children yet, or whether she likes children. While this may not be unlawful, it certainly is a turn-around from the way business used to be conducted. Racial profiling is fair game in the paperwork, largely so regulators can identify and keep statistics on whether race is a factor in the kinds of loans offered, interest rate and other qualifying factors.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Delaware County Judge Denies Bank’s Objections

I represent homeowners in Delaware County who are faced with a foreclosure lawsuit. I filed an answer to the bank’s lawsuit, and I raised various defenses to the action. The kinds of defenses in this case are that the bank is not the true owner of the Note and that my clients were victims of bait and switch tactics. For instance, on the day of settlement, the interest rate went from what was promised, at 6%, up to 8.5%. In addition, the originating lender increased the mortgage balance by lumping many of my client’s other debts (credit card bills and medical bills) into the mortgage loan, even though my clients weren’t given advanced warning of that.

The loan is allegedly owned by banking giant, Deutsche Bank, because it is the trustee of the mortgage trust that claims to own the loan. When my clients were sued, I answered in court filings that the bank engaged bait and switch and predatory practices. The banks’ lawyers filed objections to my court papers claiming that the defenses were not relevant to the actions since, in their view, all of the paperwork was in order and my clients knowingly signed onto the mortgage loan. The Delaware County trial Judge denied the bank’s objections ordered that the bank must now respond to my allegations. This was a bitterly contested motion and I am glad that we prevailed on this aspect of the case. A trial date has not yet been set.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Our Services

img

Our Latest News Posts

Firm Newsletter: April 2019

Click here to download a printable pdf of this newsletter. Supreme Court Victory Leads to Arbitration Award It certainly seemed like a long-time coming, but our firm was successful in taking our client’s case all the way to the Pennsylvania … [Read More...]

Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injuries

Nearly 50,000 patients die annually from traumatic brain injuries. Now a new study led by the University of Pennsylvania reveals that tiny blood vessels in the brain can offer clues to better treatment, according to an article from UPI’s Health … [Read More...]