MORGAN STANLEY AGREES TO PAY $1.25 BILLION FOR MORTGAGE SETTLEMENT

Morgan Stanley has now joined the ranks of JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America and other big banks in agreeing to pay huge sums of money to the Federal Housing Finance Agency to resolve claims that it sold bad mortgage securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the run-up to the housing market/mortgage crisis. Morgan Stanley recently agreed to pay $1.25 billion to the FHFA, which is the Federal conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The settlement resolved a lawsuit in which the Agency claimed that Morgan Stanley sold over $10.5 billion in mortgage-backed securities to Fannie and Freddie during the credit boom, while presenting a “false picture” of the riskiness of the loans. This is the same allegation that runs through all of these lawsuits against the big banks, but this lawsuit in particular involved securities issues between September 2005 and September 2007.

Many of the loans were originated by sub-prime lenders, like New Century and Indy Mac, and then bundled into bonds and sold to Fannie and Freddie. The lawsuit said that one group of these loans had default and delinquency rates as high as 70%. As was common in the industry, the big banks turned a blind eye to these default rates while continuing to serve as warehouse lending conduits to keep the train rolling on.

If the Morgan Stanley settlement becomes final, it will be the third-largest monetary payment by a Wall Street firm to settle an FHFA lawsuit. The largest was JP Morgan Chase at $4 billion, followed by Deutsche Bank at $1.2 billion. The FHFA still has some work to do, in that it still has approximately 12 other lawsuits filed against other financial institutions.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

COMPLICATED LITIGATION RESULTS IN FAVORABLE SETTLEMENT

On June 30, 2005, my client took out a $104,000 loan and mortgage on his family’s home in Southwest Philadelphia. The original lender was Indy Mac Bank, a sub-prime lender, whose operations were essentially taken over by the FDIC for what many believed were shoddy lending practices. The loan carried a low interest rate for the first two months, and then increased to an exorbitant interest rate for the next 29 years and 10 months. The mortgage broker, however, told my client at closing that he would be able to refinance the loan within a matter of months. This false promise never materialized, leaving my client with a deceptive, unfair and unreasonably high interest rate for the life of the loan.

One West Bank acquired the mortgage loan, which was later serviced by Ocwen Loan Servicing. One West filed a foreclosure lawsuit, and we filed a counterclaim and cross-claim against other lenders. The bank’s attorneys and I engaged in written discovery and multiple depositions, and in the fall of 2013, the Court scheduled a series of settlement conferences. The case was scheduled for trial in March, 2014.

By the time the case would be presented for trial, however, the balance on the loan was going to be approximately $187,000, almost twice as much as the original mortgage loan. The parties, however, reached a settlement, which lowered the principal balance by nearly $100,000, to $93,000. The settlement also called for an interest rate of 2% for the first 5 years, and for the remaining 5 years at 4.35%. While the case took almost 3 years to wind its way through the court, we were able to reach a favorable result.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Now Lenders are Being Extra Careful

During the mortgage lending boom in the middle of the last decade, prospective loan originators and mortgage brokers would lend money to almost anyone, whether the perspective homeowner had sufficient income to pay the loan back or not. In recent days, however, lenders are risk-averse, and they are demanding detailed documentation for all areas of the applicant’s financial status and background. Borrowers should be prepared to answer questions about gaps in their employment, pending lawsuits and even divorce proceedings.

There is, however, a limit to how much personal information can be requested. Questions about whether an applicant is pregnant are prohibited under federal law, but lenders have figured ways of getting around those delicate (and unlawful) inquiries. For instance, the lender may ask a young woman, applying for a mortgage on her own, whether she has any children yet, or whether she likes children. While this may not be unlawful, it certainly is a turn-around from the way business used to be conducted. Racial profiling is fair game in the paperwork, largely so regulators can identify and keep statistics on whether race is a factor in the kinds of loans offered, interest rate and other qualifying factors.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Our Services

img

Our Latest News Posts

Firm Newsletter: April 2019

Click here to download a printable pdf of this newsletter. Supreme Court Victory Leads to Arbitration Award It certainly seemed like a long-time coming, but our firm was successful in taking our client’s case all the way to the Pennsylvania … [Read More...]

Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injuries

Nearly 50,000 patients die annually from traumatic brain injuries. Now a new study led by the University of Pennsylvania reveals that tiny blood vessels in the brain can offer clues to better treatment, according to an article from UPI’s Health … [Read More...]