Little Known Foreclosure Abuses

In early 2012, the nation’s five big banks settled with state and federal regulators over widespread foreclosure abuses, including the seizure of homes without due process. Many of the abuses keep coming to light, but one little-known and rarely-discussed violation is becoming more widespread as banks foreclose on more homes.

After a homeowner is delinquent in their mortgage, the lender is allowed to hire a property management company to determine whether the homeowner had abandoned his or her home. If so, the management company is allowed to secure the vacant property, within reason. It does not always happen that way, and the nation’s largest property management company, Safe Guard, has been accused of breaking Illinois law, with allegations that it broke into homes despite evidence of occupancy, even damaging and removing personal property in the process. There are also charges that Safe Guard changed locks, cut off utilities and bullied occupants into leaving their homes when they actually had a legal right to stay there.

In mid-September, 2013, the Illinois attorney general filed a lawsuit against Safe Guard to hold it accountable for these violations. Under the 2012 Foreclosure Settlement, lenders became responsible for supervising and auditing the contractors, including ones like Safe Guard. There is certainly profit motive for the bank to take control of these vacant homes, since the sooner the house can be sold and the more the home is worth, the better. The banks are not able to make any money on occupied homes that haven’t yet forged their way through the foreclosure litigation process.

The bottom line is that eviction is only permissible after the legal process has concluded. In New Jersey and Pennsylvania, this means after a Final Judgment of Foreclosure has been entered and the property has been sold at a lawful Sheriff’s Sale.

For its part, Safe Guard claims that its work meets the highest standards in the industry. As these abuses keep coming to light, it remains to be seen how it will all affect the nearly 3 million homeowners who are in or near foreclosure.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Mortgage Deliquencies Remain High in New Jersey

Even though there is an improving nationwide real estate market, mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures continue to be a problem in New Jersey. The national mortgage delinquency rate – defined as borrowers who are at least 60 days past due on their payments – shrank by 26% in the Second Quarter of 2013, when compared to the same period one year ago, according to TransUnion, the credit information service. The delinquency rate in August, 2013 was approximately 4.1%, still double what it was in the pre-recession period, but it is still on a downward trend.

Locally, however, things are not so good. While Florida and Nevada have the highest delinquency rates (9.9% and 8%, respectively), New Jersey is right behind them, at 7.2%.

In New Jersey, there were 4455 mortgage foreclosure lawsuits filed in July, and 4222 foreclosure lawsuits filed in August, 2013, a dramatic rise from 2012 and early 2013. In New Jersey, the nation’s biggest lenders have recently filed motion papers that are paving the way and allowing a greater number of foreclosure lawsuits to be filed. In New Jersey, it is expected that the number of foreclosure lawsuits will continue to increase through the end of 2013.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Mortgage Foreclosure Defense Authority Presents Educational Program to Voorhees Homeowners

shaffer-gaier-library-speaker

Defending the Mortgage Foreclosure Action – Current Trends and Cases

Defending the Mortgage Foreclosure Action – Seminar and Luncheon

Featuring Speaker Michael Gaier

foreclosure-seminar-image

Click HERE for additional information, and to sign up to attend!

‘Don’t Lose Your Home’ – Foreclosure Seminar Being Held September 4

Foreclosure Defense Seminar

foreclosure-seminar-sept-13

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

National Mortgage Settlement Review Prompts Dual – Tracking Discussions With Banks

State and federal regulators are considering whether or not to impose additional restrictions on the mortgage practices of five of the nation’s largest banks. State attorneys and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development have already discussed with two big banks about further restrictions, and these discussions are the result of “complaints related to provisions in last year’s multi-state mortgage robo-signing settlement between dozens of government agencies and Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup and Ally Financial”. This settlement has delivered tens of billions of dollars in mortgage aid, and while the companies have made strides in reforming servicing practices, much more improvement is still needed. The fact is, the relief is having no effect on keeping most distressed homeowners in their homes.

Officials claim that they are considering a change in the current policy — they want banks to “halt foreclosure proceedings when borrowers first apply for loan modifications and provide basic information”. With this halt, officials hope to speed decisions on loan modifications and limit the amount of fees imposed on distressed borrowers. While it is important for borrowers to get an answer on their loan, and whether the answer is “yes or no”, the borrower should feel relieved to escape the months-long limbo that often accompanies the request for a loan modification. One official has even said that “delays in processing mortgage modification requests are the number one problem in the servicing today”.

In the new policy, Joseph Smith, the head of the Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight and his team hope to implement up to four new tests that would grade the banks’ compliance. Two of these tests would “test the effectiveness of banks’ implementation of a requirement to provide a ‘single point of contact’ for distressed borrowers looking to avert foreclosure” (Huffington Post, 1). The third test involves modification requests and the fourth grades how well the banks upgrade borrowers’ account information. It is a tall order, in our view, to get the big banks to get anything done quickly.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Foreclosure Fraud Against Deutsche Bank Yields $30,000

Shaffer & Gaier’s client agreed to a $30,000 cash settlement with Deutsche Bank in an action filed by the banking giant to foreclose on his New Jersey investment property. When purchased in 2006, the property was worth approximately $110,000, but at the time of the trial the value had fallen to $65,000. Shaffer & Gaier’s review of the loan documents uncovered fraud committed by the Lender in the underwriting process.

After Deutsche Bank filed its foreclosure action, Shaffer & Gaier filed a counterclaim based on fraud and misrepresentation (the lender grossly inflated our client’s federal tax return income when qualifying him for the loan and failed to disclose that to the client). During pretrial discovery and trial preparation, Shaffer & Gaier proved that the bank’s assignment documents (which give the Lender the right to bring the foreclosure lawsuit) were defective and therefore it did not have the right to foreclose.

Along with the counterclaim, this allowed the client to successfully settle the claim on the third day of trial. As part of the terms of the settlement, our client was entitled to retain the property and collect the rental income for an expected period of 18 months, free of mortgage payment obligations.

Interest – Only Loan Settlement

Shaffer & Gaier’s clients owned a vacation home on the Jersey Shore since 1989, and in 2007 a mortgage broker qualified them to refinance into an “interest-only, negative amortization loan”. While our clients’ loan allowed them to make “interest-only” payments that were lower than a traditional monthly mortgage payment, the loan was misleading because the balance of the loan increased each month, even though a payment was being made. This is often because the Truth in Lending document does not appear consistent with the true terms of the loan.

These loans are so deceptive for the homeowner that they have been outlawed in many states while many of the big banks have even stopped offering the loans to prospective homeowners. Shaffer & Gaier filed a lawsuit in Cape May County, NJ against the lender and secured a confidential settlement in July, 2012 for money damages which allowed our clients to recoup the amount of interest they had paid since the loan’s inception.

Foreclosure Defense Workshop

Foreclosure Defense Seminar

Tuesday, July 23, 2013 – 7pm

For location information: FORECLOSURE DEFENSE SEMINAR

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Options After Act 91 Notice

There are generally three options for a homeowner after the bank sends its pre-foreclosure notices:

1. Cure The Default – Within 30 days from the date of the ACT 91 Notice, the borrower may cure the default by bringing the mortgage current. The borrower must pay the total amount past due plus late fees. There also may be associated attorney or legal fees.

A. If the default is cured before the lender refers the account to their attorney, the borrower will not incur any legal fees.

B. If the default is cured after the lender has referred the account to his attorney but prior to commencement of legal proceedings, the homeowner will be responsible for legal fees up to and not in excess of $50.00.

C. If the default is cured after the lender’s attorney has begun legal proceedings, the homeowner will be responsible for ALL legal fees (even those in excess of $50.00).

2. Meet With A Consumer Credit Counselor – Within 30 days from the date of the ACT 91 notice, the borrower may meet with a consumer credit counselor located in the county where the mortgaged property is located.

Borrower has 30 days from the date of this meeting to file a HEMAP application. The consumer credit counselor will supply the application and assist the borrower in completing it. They are the only agency approved for submission of the application.
HEMAP may take up to 60 days to make a decision. During this time, no foreclosure proceedings may be brought against the borrower.

3. Homeowner Takes No Action – If the homeowner takes no action within 30 days from the date of the Act 91 Notice, the lender will exercise her right to accelerate the mortgage debt. The entire outstanding balance becomes due immediately and the borrower loses the right to pay the mortgage in monthly installments. The lender refers the account to her foreclosure attorney who begins the legal process of foreclosing on the mortgaged property. A lawsuit can then be filed in the county where the property is located. An answer must be filed with the court within thirty days or else the bank may secure a default judgment against the homeowner.

Our Services

img

Our Latest News Posts

Firm Newsletter: April 2019

Click here to download a printable pdf of this newsletter. Supreme Court Victory Leads to Arbitration Award It certainly seemed like a long-time coming, but our firm was successful in taking our client’s case all the way to the Pennsylvania … [Read More...]

Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injuries

Nearly 50,000 patients die annually from traumatic brain injuries. Now a new study led by the University of Pennsylvania reveals that tiny blood vessels in the brain can offer clues to better treatment, according to an article from UPI’s Health … [Read More...]