Rental Property Foreclosure Lawsuit – Philadelphia

We represent a woman who owns a rental property in Philadelphia. I took the case over from a lawyer who responded to the bank’s lawsuit, but there was very little done in the way of discovery. The case was called for trial on July 8, 2014, and the bank, Bank of America, flew in one if its corporate witnesses to testify at the trial. In my client’s Answer to the foreclosure lawsuit, her previous lawyer admitted that she signed a Mortgage Note to repay Bank of America $93,000. Based on this, the bank’s witness did not bring the original Note to the trial.

The problem for the bank, however, is that the plaintiff in the lawsuit was a Wall Street trust, U.S. Bank National, as trustee, who acquired the Note in the securitization process. This means that the Mortgage was owned by the Trust, and not by Bank of America. Without bringing the Note to trial, which presumably would show that the Note was “negotiated” or transferred from Bank of America to the trust, I moved for a non-suit during the trial at the close of the bank’s evidence. I successfully argued that the Plaintiff did not prove that it had standing to enforce the Mortgage and Note because there was no evidence before the court that Plaintiff’s trust owned the Note (or the debt). The Honorable Idee Fox requested legal briefs on the issues, and then after oral argument, the court granted my motion for a non-suit and the foreclosure action was dismissed. It is not expected that the bank will appeal this action, and their only recourse will be to start the entire process over and file a new foreclosure lawsuit.

Contact Our Office

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

Recovering from a Short Sale

Borrowers who owe more money than their homes are worth sometimes can get out from under by negotiating a short sale with their lender. A short sale is when a lender agrees to accept less than is owed on a property and in result, the borrower can walk away and avoid foreclosure. Yet, short-sellers are branded as high-risk borrowers, so new loans will not come quickly or easily. Fannie Mae, the federally controlled mortgage investor, sets a minimum amount of time that must elapse before a short-seller is eligible for another loan. For example, for those who can only put down 10 percent on their next home, Fannie Mae requires a four-year waiting period. Yet, borrowers who can put down 20 percent of their next home, the waiting period is shortened to two years. This waiting period is a penalty on borrowers who did not fully repay a previous loan and even if you could put 30 or 40 percent down, you would still have a two-year borrowing period. Short-sellers who are getting back into the housing market should keep detailed records of their income sources and should avoid loans which require very little money or no money down.

A Fix for the Mortgage Market?

The Senate Banking Committee is set to vote on a bipartisan bill, which aims to rejuvenate the housing market while guarding against the excesses of the past. This bill has been named the Housing Finance Reform and Taxpayer Protection Act of 2014, with the goal to ensure broad and steady access to sustainable and affordable mortgages by providing an explicit government guarantee to attract investment in 30-year fixed-rate mortgages and other loans. In addition, this bill includes a new financing provision, a fee on government-guaranteed securities, to generate money for affordable housing. Essentially, this bill would end Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—federally backed mortgage companies with implicit government guarantees and confusing ownership status—but would continue vital federal support for mortgages though the Federal Mortgage Insurance Corporation. Overall, this bill hopes to ensure that mortgage loans are broadly available, while giving taxpayers a housing market that serves the long-term interests of families and the broader economy. Yet, this bill is overly complex and is subject to being misinterpreted and falling short, especially on the subject of fostering affordable mortgages.

Fallout from Refinancing

Homeowners who refinanced when fixed mortgage rates dropped below 4 percent are less inclined to put their homes on the market as interest rates increase. As a result, the limited property supply already impending sales in many markets may not ease anytime soon. A recent survey by Redfin showed that even recipients of low-refinance rates who decided that they want to move may want to make money by renting out their own homes while waiting for prices to rise, rather than selling right away. Most borrowers cannot afford to buy another home without using equity from their first down payment. Yet, those who take advantage of low refinance rates tend to be “premium consumers” with very good credit and stable income. Before these people decide to rent out their homes, they may want to consider a few other factors. For example, managing a rental property is a very large effort. In addition, there is a greater financial risk for those who own two homes in the same market if home prices take a dive. Lastly, the reasons for renting a home always change.

Contact Our Office

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

THE ELUSIVE HOUSING RECOVERY

With all the happy talk recently about the nation’s housing recovery, much of eastern Pennsylvania and central and southern New Jersey real estate markets still have a significant amount of homes that are underwater (when the mortgage balance is greater than the value of the home). Many of these properties were purchased or refinanced by homeowners during the housing bubble which collapsed in 2007.

Recent reports continue to suggest that the best solution for all parties (banks, homeowners, investors, states and municipalities) is for the approach of “principal reduction.” By this method, if lenders rewrote the loans to reflect fair market values, then owners would have lower monthly payments which would put more money and tax dollars into local economies. Cities and towns could have more stable property tax revenues and lenders may ultimately benefit by having fewer delinquent loans.

The solution is not so simple because many banks no longer own the loans they made. Many of the underwater home loans have been pooled into private securities, and sold off to investors. The companies who service these securities and loans generally will not reduce the principal because, since they do not own the loan, they do not have the authority to reduce the principal balance. With all the talk over the last 12 to 18 months about settlement agreements between the Justice Department and the big banks, none of these initiatives require the banks or their investors to reset loans as a condition of getting Federal funds. Even the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) has helped barely 25% of the 4 million homeowners it was supposed to reach. Worse still, the Federal Government itself is an obstacle to a lot of the reform measures because the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, will not allow these two mortgage giants to reduce the principal on any of the underwater mortgages they own or guarantee. The new FHFA director, former-Representative Melvin Watt, could change that policy and he could do it without Congressional approval. It remains to be seen if the Administration will embark on principal reduction.

Contact Our Office

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

FORECLOSURE ERRORS CONFIRMED

On Wednesday, April 30, 2014, a Federal regulator confirmed that the biggest banks committed widespread errors when dealing with homeowners who faced foreclosure at the height of the mortgage crisis. The report released by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency was really a post-mortem of the earlier-released Independent Foreclosure Review, a very expensive review though limited in scope, of how the banks mistreated homeowners in the foreclosure process.

Almost 10% of the errors discovered in the review involve situations when banks improperly denied loan modifications that would have prevented a foreclosure filing in the first place. Many of these errors involved administrative flaws and improper fees being charged to the homeowners during the foreclosure process. In 2013, however, 15 banks settled with banking regulators making payments that totaled $3.9 billion, paid out to more than 4 million homeowners (averaging about $1,100 per household). These settlements ended the Independent Reviews, and the banks agreed to pay homeowners regardless of whether they had been harmed. The banks and regulators agreed to halt the review process because it was so expensive and lengthy, even though only a small fraction of the mortgage files were reviewed.

The report released on April 30 showed that the banks had made even less progress in the reviews than was previously disclosed. For example, Bank of America reviewed only 6% of its files, yet revealed a financial error rate of nearly 9%. Wells Fargo examined less than 10% of its records, and found an error rate of nearly 11.5%. Parties on both sides of the crisis were not pleased, and one reason could be that the decision to cut short the review left regulators with limited information about actual harm to borrowers, even though there was a multi-billion dollar settlement.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier – Protecting Homeowner Rights

The law firm of Shaffer & Gaier protects the rights of those who are facing foreclosure or seeking mortgage modifications in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Multi – Million Foreclosure Rescue and Real Estate Ponzi Scheme in New Jersey

May 14, 2014 – FBI Special Agents in Philadelphia arrested a New Jersey man Wednesday morning for allegedly operating a multi – million dollar ponzi scheme involving foreclosure rescue and real estate investment. An operator of Equity Capital Investments, LLC (and the former president of the South Jersey Real Estate Investment Club), Randy Poulson of Woolwich Township, New Jersey, is charged with using his investment company to scam property investors. Mr. Poulson is also accused of stealing the deeds from 24+ struggling homeowners who were facing foreclosure.

Poulson allegedly devised a two-part scam in which he promised distressed homeowners, who were facing foreclosure, that he would pay for their mortgages if they sold their homes to him. They did this by signing over the deeds to their home to Poulson. He then had the victims vacate their homes so that renters could move in. Then, he ceased making mortgage payments to the original home owner’s lender.

Part two of Poulson’s scheme involved soliciting 50+ private investors. He pitched investors at seminars, speeches and dinners he attended to invest in real estate and properties for rehabilitation. He advised them that he would be able to sell these investments for a return of 10 to 20 percent. Poulson created fake mortgages and promissory notes to give to investors in order to legitimize his company.

Randy Poulson pocketed both the homeowners’ and the investors’ money for his own personal use. Poulson spent the money at Acme, Exxon/Mobil, Jos. A. Bank, DirecTV, Hollywood Grooming, Kiddie Garden, Philadelphia Union tickets, American Express, Studio 122 (a hair salon), The Disney Store, Toys ‘R Us, Wawa, eating at Ray’s Pizza, and payments on a personal beach house in Ventnor, New Jersey.

Contact Our Office

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

New Jersey Resident Wins Damages Against Predatory Lending Practices

The average homeowner does in fact have recourse against the big banks when it comes to mortgage fraud and foreclosure defense. Goods news comes this past January from a ruling by New Jersey Chancery Judge Peter Doyne that says Wells Fargo committed actionable fraud and predatory lending.

The case involves Oscar Montesdeoca, of New Jersey. Evidently, Montesdeoca was persuaded to borrow $600,000 pus dollars for a three-bedroom home at interest rates that ranged from 7.75 percent to 14.35 percent.

The ruling is considered a significant victory in the battle against predatory lending practices in New Jersey, where another home foreclosure occurs every eight minutes! In the case in question, the mortgage for the home was $4800 a month. However, Montesdeoca earned between $500 and $600 a week, with his wife working for $7.00 per hour. They could not possibly have covered the mortgage, which ended up being $5700 a month, including insurance.

It was determined that the loan officer who worked with Montesdeoca had promised that “if he paid the loan and maintained good credit (for two years) he would receive refinancing” to reduce the high interest rates.

The couple couldn’t read the paperwork, which was in English, and learned only later that the bank listed their income as over $10,000 a month, when it was far from that amount. When the couple’s son requested that the bank refinance the mortgage in order to lower the high interest rate, as the officer had promised, the bank officer never responded.

The good outcome is that the bank was made to refinance the loans, and pay all the couple’s legal fees, as well as three times his damages, as required by New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier: Protecting Homeowner Rights

The law firm of Shaffer & Gaier protects the rights of those who are facing foreclosure or seeking mortgage modifications in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Source: http://www.responsiblelending.org/tools-resources/headlines/opinion-nj-court-resurrects-american-dream-from-foreclosure-nightmare.html

Foreclosure Defense in PA and NJ

If you have encountered financial problems and fallen behind on your mortgage, you may believe that your only option is to move out and allow your lender to foreclose on the property. To the contrary, there are many good reasons to fight foreclosure. Fighting foreclosure could give you an affordable place to live until you get your financial situation turned around. You may even be able to renegotiate your loan to make it affordable. The attorneys at Shaffer & Gaier, can help protect your rights.

Contact Us

To schedule a private meeting with an experienced foreclosure defense attorney, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

Despite Housing Market Turnaround, Foreclosures High

Data released in late January notes that New Jersey may become the nation’s leader in the number of foreclosed homes by summer 2014. Mark Fleming, a chief economist for the online analytic firm CoreLogic.

Since the real estate bust in fall 2008, Florida had the highest percent of foreclosed homes, with New Jersey coming in second. By 2013, slightly over 10 percent of Florida homes with mortgages had undergone foreclosure. In contrast, New Jersey’s rate was slightly over 7 percent. It seems that New Jersey is going through the process much slower than Florida.

In fact, in the past year, while Florida competed 119,000 foreclosures, New Jersey’s completed just 5,138. It evidently takes about 1,002 days to resolve foreclosures in the Garden State, while the Sunshine State completes them in 883 days.

Foreclosure Backlogs in New Jersey

New Jersey’s struggles escalated when the state Supreme Court ordered the six largest banks to review their procedures for lending money. Filings at that time fell from 58,000 in 2010 to 6,000 in July 2011, creating a significant backlog.

It will be just a matter of time before New Jersey gets to the top of the list. The good news is that home sales have reached their highest levels since 2005, up about 18 percent in 2013.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier: Protecting Homeowner Rights

The law firm of Shaffer & Gaier protects the rights of those who are facing foreclosure or seeking mortgage modifications in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

MORGAN STANLEY AGREES TO PAY $1.25 BILLION FOR MORTGAGE SETTLEMENT

Morgan Stanley has now joined the ranks of JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America and other big banks in agreeing to pay huge sums of money to the Federal Housing Finance Agency to resolve claims that it sold bad mortgage securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the run-up to the housing market/mortgage crisis. Morgan Stanley recently agreed to pay $1.25 billion to the FHFA, which is the Federal conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The settlement resolved a lawsuit in which the Agency claimed that Morgan Stanley sold over $10.5 billion in mortgage-backed securities to Fannie and Freddie during the credit boom, while presenting a “false picture” of the riskiness of the loans. This is the same allegation that runs through all of these lawsuits against the big banks, but this lawsuit in particular involved securities issues between September 2005 and September 2007.

Many of the loans were originated by sub-prime lenders, like New Century and Indy Mac, and then bundled into bonds and sold to Fannie and Freddie. The lawsuit said that one group of these loans had default and delinquency rates as high as 70%. As was common in the industry, the big banks turned a blind eye to these default rates while continuing to serve as warehouse lending conduits to keep the train rolling on.

If the Morgan Stanley settlement becomes final, it will be the third-largest monetary payment by a Wall Street firm to settle an FHFA lawsuit. The largest was JP Morgan Chase at $4 billion, followed by Deutsche Bank at $1.2 billion. The FHFA still has some work to do, in that it still has approximately 12 other lawsuits filed against other financial institutions.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

RELIEF FOR SOME HOMEOWNERS – BUT THEN A TAX BILL?

The big banks will be able to write-off the billions of dollars in debt relief they agreed to give to homeowners, but for the homeowners that received that help, the debt relief is treated as taxable income, which can result in large tax bills. There had been a tax exemption for mortgage debt forgiveness, but Congress let this expire on December 31, 2013. While Congress often allows tax breaks to expire, only to reinstate them later, the mortgage debt relief exemption has not yet occurred. This could partly be because there is a movement in Congress to broadly overhaul the entire tax code, and in an election year, this year was considered “small” relative to other tax matters that affect the nation as a whole.

The tax exemption helped homeowners who are underwater in their mortgage – that is, those who owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth (approximately 6.4 million households nationwide). Put in real terms, this means that if you owe $250,000 on your mortgage, and your bank lets you sell it by way of a short sale for $150,000, then the $100,000 difference is treated as taxable income. This would lead to an approximately $28,000 tax bill because of the typical tax laws in which if someone lends you money and then later says you do not have to pay it back, the IRS counts the amount forgiven as income (except in cases of bankruptcy or insolvency). Nationwide, approximately 100,000 people used the mortgage debt relief exemption in 2011. In 2013, however, that number will be much greater, simply because there were approximately 250,000 short sales, yielding an average debt reduction of approximately $37,000. A homeowner in the 25% tax bracket would then face an extra $9,250 tax bill.

What remains to be seen is if Congress recognizes the unfairness of giving the banks a welcome form of tax relief, while piling even more debt upon the innocent homeowner.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Our Services

img

Our Latest News Posts

Firm Newsletter: April 2019

Click here to download a printable pdf of this newsletter. Supreme Court Victory Leads to Arbitration Award It certainly seemed like a long-time coming, but our firm was successful in taking our client’s case all the way to the Pennsylvania … [Read More...]

Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injuries

Nearly 50,000 patients die annually from traumatic brain injuries. Now a new study led by the University of Pennsylvania reveals that tiny blood vessels in the brain can offer clues to better treatment, according to an article from UPI’s Health … [Read More...]