Loan Modification Jury Trial Against Well Fargo

I just wrapped up a jury trial in New Jersey Federal Court against Wells Fargo. The litigation was lengthy and complicated and is hard to summarize in a blog.   It was settled during closing arguments after A LOT of time and energy went into it—Wells Fargo, as usual, was represented by Reed Smith.   In 2009, my clients were current with their mortgage, but asked Wells for a refinance.  Instead they were pushed into applying for a loan modification so long as they paid an up-front fee of $2,415.  One more thing—Wells said that they’d have to be delinquent in their mortgage to qualify (I’ve heard the same thing from many of my clients).  My clients thought that sounded strange, but followed Wells’ representatives instructions. They paid the $2,415 application fee and stopped paying their loan.

Wells also told them, and then wrote to them, that the fee would be returned to them if the loan modification was denied.  Which it was a few months later—but Wells never returned the money.  Wells then confused my clients’ paperwork with others, but told my clients that they’d keep trying to get them a loan mod.  While this was happening, Wells filed a foreclosure lawsuit against my clients, but didn’t even notify them of that important event until 2 months later.  Wells eventually denied the loan modification, and then took a foreclosure judgment.  Wells was lining the home up for Sheriff Sale when my clients retained me.  I got Wells to hold up on the Sheriff Sale, and then I filed the federal court action for NJ Consumer Fraud for 1) not returning the $2,415 and 2) for foreclosing when they should’ve been working with my clients to modify their loan.

The end result was that Wells and my clients agreed to a modification and Wells agreed to pay a confidential sum of money to settle the case.

Avoid Foreclosure by Modifying Your Mortgage

When you hire us to help you with a loan modification, we will become your voice in all dealings with your lender. If we are unable to immediately get the process moving with loan or bank officers, we will work directly with attorneys for the bank to get the modification process moving forward. We have a comprehensive understanding of the programs available to help you refinance or restructure your loan and avoid foreclosure. We will carefully evaluate your circumstances to determine what programs you qualify for, and we will explain your options as well as the benefits and consequences of different strategies.

Contact Our Office

To set up an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Your first consultation is free of charge. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

 

Home Health Care Workers Not Receiving Full Wages They Are Entitled To

Our firm is investigating possible claims by home health workers who have not received their full wages as mandated by Federal and State Law. Many class actions have been filed in other states against their employers because the home health care workers were paid on a “fee basis” when they were entitled to hourly and overtime pay for their work .

We are interviewing potential clients from both Pennsylvania and New Jersey who may have not received their entire wage under both State and Federal law. Some of these employers include the following companies:

  • Almost Family-growth-oriented, multi-regional provider of home health care and personal care services
  • Apria Health  Care-the largest diversified provider of home health services in the United States, focused on home respiratory therapy, home medical equipment and home infusion therapy
  • Community Health  Systems-at $13 billion in annual revenue, one of the nation’s largest publicly traded hospital operators, with home health care and hospice units
  • Lincare-nationwide oxygen, respiratory, home infusion and durable medical equipment company, now based in Germany
  • LHC Group-multiregional provider of home health, hospice services and hospital and institutional services
  • National Healthcare  Corp.-publicly traded operator of long-term health care centers, with associated assisted living and home health care services
  • Rotech-Orlando-based national respiratory care company, currently under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
  • VITAS-a division of publicly traded Chemed, one of the largest hospice providers in the United States
  • Bayada Nurses- Mount Larel, NJ
  • American Homepatient
  • ATC Healthcare, Inc.
  • Chemed Corp.
  • CHG Healthcare Services
  • Genentech
  • Loving Care Agency
  • Matria Healthcare

Contact the Lawyers at Shaffer & Gaier

For a free initial consultation, contact us online, or call us in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100 or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970. You can also reach our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

SoFi and Online Mortgage Lending

SoFi – How Millennial Usage of Online Mortgage Lending is Changing the Home Lending Landscape

A young couple each in their early 30’s found themselves buying a house outside of San Francisco. Being first time buyers, they searched for sources of financing on the Internet. Online they found a lender called social finance (SoFi). They received pre-qualification in 15 minutes and then got the documents for pre-approval and submitted a formal offer within a week. Because of SoFi’s simplicity, they were able to easily close on their new home.

Large groups of millennials are changing the mortgage industry because more and more lenders are using technology that enables borrowers to submit documentation online. This allows more non-bank start a blenders to compete in the mortgage industry and it also gets mortgage brokers out of the mix (who many blame on the crisis of the last decade) . Online lenders like SoFi are so appealing to millennials because of their online tools and fast closing times. Borrowers feel much more in control of their financial status due to the DIY system provided by online lenders. This freedom is what banks are unable to match.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier – Protecting Homeowner Rights

The law firm of Shaffer & Gaier protects the rights of those who are facing foreclosure or seeking mortgage modifications in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

The Home Affordable Modification Program’s Paltry Lifeline

A Slack Lifeline for Drowning Homeowners

JULY 31, 2015 By GRETCHEN MORGENSON

“After Lucy Circe became disabled and could no longer work, she applied to Bank of America for a mortgage loan modification on her Vermont home. Over more than two years, starting in 2012, the bank repeatedly requested copies of documents that had already been provided, asked for proof that she was no longer married to a man she did not even know, and made other errors, like asking why Ms. Circe had indicated that she didn’t want to keep her property when she had actually told the bank she did….” READ MORE HERE.

Contact an Aggressive Foreclosure Defense Lawyer at Shaffer & Gaier Today

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

2015 Super Lawyers Announcement

Shaffer and Gaier Selected as 2015 Pennsylvania SuperLawyers

Our firm is proud to announce that Michael Shaffer (PERSONAL INJURY) and Michael Gaier (BUSINESS LITIGATION) have again been selected as Super Lawyers in Pennsylvania.

We’d like to express our gratitude to our many clients that have made this achievement so professionally rewarding.

Contact the Lawyers at Shaffer & Gaier

For a free initial consultation, contact us online, or call us in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100 or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970. You can also reach our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

Wells Fargo Foreclosure Lawsuit

My client was offered a loan in 2007 by a broker who worked with Wells Fargo. His income at the time did not really support the loan, and he was hoping that the real estate would lift the value of his home. This, unfortunately, did not happen and over time, he was no longer able to keep up with his mortgage payments. As required by law, the bank sent a Notice of Intent to foreclose which notified my client how much he owed on the mortgage in order to make it current. Wells Fargo filed a Foreclosure lawsuit in Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas in 2010. I defended the lawsuit, and after motion practice and quite a bit of discovery, Wells Fargo withdrew the lawsuit. Three months later, however, Wells Fargo initiated a new lawsuit, again in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas.

Wells Fargo, however, did not send my client a new and updated Notice of Intent to foreclose before they filed the second lawsuit. After discovery, the bank filed a motion for summary judgment and the trial court granted the motion which gave the bank the right to foreclose. I argued that Wells fargo was required to send my client a new, updated Notice of Intent, and since they did not, then the foreclosure was unlawful.

I filed an appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court on the grounds that the lender was required to send an update Notice of intent before they filed a second lawsuit. Wells Fargo opposed the motion by claiming that it was nothing more than a formality and since the first Notice of Intent was sent, there was no need to send a revised one.

The Superior Court agreed with me and reversed the trial court’s order of summary judgment. Wells Fargo filed a motion for reconsideration which was denied on January 4th, 2015. I expect there will be an appeal to the Superior Court. The current status is Wells Fargo is attempting to take ownership of the home upon which they wrongfully foreclosed so I am considering filing a lawsuit against Wells Fargo to redress my client’s damages. -Michael Gaier

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To schedule a free initial consultation, contact us online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

PA SUPREME COURTS ALLOWS DEFAULT TO STAND AGAINST BANK OF AMERICA

As an update to a blog I posted in January, 2014, in which I discussed a default judgment I secured for my client against Bank of America, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court just ordered that the default judgment shall remain in place. I filed a lawsuit against Bank of America in Delaware County, PA for predatory lending and unfair trade practices. The bank failed to answer the lawsuit and I moved for a default judgment. Of course, the bank appealed, asking the trial judge to allow it to file an Answer, but the trial judge refused. The bank unsuccessfully appealed to the Superior Court and then to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, also unsuccessfully.

This means that the case can now proceed to a jury trial to determine the amount of my clients’ monetary damages. Certain discovery issues need to be worked out; primarily I am in the process of securing testimony from a Bank of America Corporate Representative regarding the net worth of the company in 2012 and 2013.

This is because I included a claim for punitive damages, which are used to punish the defendant for wrongful conduct. One of the ways that a jury is allowed to and able to determine an appropriate dollar amount for damages is to consider the net worth of the defendant. The Bank is, of course, objecting to such an inquiry, and is not agreeing to produce such a representative; again, the trial judge will decide the scope of the deposition testimony. I am hopeful for trial in January/February 2015. I will keep you posted.

Contact the law firm of Shaffer & Gaier, LLC

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

Multi – Million Foreclosure Rescue and Real Estate Ponzi Scheme in New Jersey

May 14, 2014 – FBI Special Agents in Philadelphia arrested a New Jersey man Wednesday morning for allegedly operating a multi – million dollar ponzi scheme involving foreclosure rescue and real estate investment. An operator of Equity Capital Investments, LLC (and the former president of the South Jersey Real Estate Investment Club), Randy Poulson of Woolwich Township, New Jersey, is charged with using his investment company to scam property investors. Mr. Poulson is also accused of stealing the deeds from 24+ struggling homeowners who were facing foreclosure.

Poulson allegedly devised a two-part scam in which he promised distressed homeowners, who were facing foreclosure, that he would pay for their mortgages if they sold their homes to him. They did this by signing over the deeds to their home to Poulson. He then had the victims vacate their homes so that renters could move in. Then, he ceased making mortgage payments to the original home owner’s lender.

Part two of Poulson’s scheme involved soliciting 50+ private investors. He pitched investors at seminars, speeches and dinners he attended to invest in real estate and properties for rehabilitation. He advised them that he would be able to sell these investments for a return of 10 to 20 percent. Poulson created fake mortgages and promissory notes to give to investors in order to legitimize his company.

Randy Poulson pocketed both the homeowners’ and the investors’ money for his own personal use. Poulson spent the money at Acme, Exxon/Mobil, Jos. A. Bank, DirecTV, Hollywood Grooming, Kiddie Garden, Philadelphia Union tickets, American Express, Studio 122 (a hair salon), The Disney Store, Toys ‘R Us, Wawa, eating at Ray’s Pizza, and payments on a personal beach house in Ventnor, New Jersey.

Contact Our Office

We provide a free initial consultation to anyone with concerns about foreclosure or who is involved in foreclosure proceedings. To schedule an appointment, call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660 or contact us online. Evening and weekend meetings can be arranged upon request. We will travel to your home if necessary to meet with you.

City Board Agrees our Client is not Subject to Real Estate Taxes

We represent a large and influential Mosque in Philadelphia which has been in existence for over 20 years. The Mosque was not just a place of worship, but it also contains a K-8th grade school and serves as a community center, near 4th and Germantown Avenue. Even though we had secured IRS section 501c3 non-profit status years ago, and have continually complied with all levels of governmental regulation, the City of Philadelphia would not agree that the Mosque was entitled to tax-free status for local property taxes (like churches, synagogues, private schools, etc).

The City required that we prove the Mosque was a “charitable organization”. We appealed the tax assessment and litigated the matter for over 18 months. I am pleased to report that on December 24, 2013, the Board of Revision of Taxes issued a decision that our client is only responsible for a tax on 2% of the property (representing the portion of the property that is “for-profit”—a small restaurant located inside the building.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

SUPERIOR COURT UPHOLDS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST BANK OF AMERICA

We sued Bank of America on behalf of our client in a classic case of predatory lending (bait and switch, undisclosed terms, etc.). The lawsuit was filed on August 31, 2012, and we served it on Bank of America by regular and certified mail, as the court rules permit, on September 5, 2012. Bank of America failed to respond, and I secured a default judgment against Bank of America on October 31, 2012.

Over a month later, on December 12, 2012, Bank of America filed a petition to open the default judgment, claiming that I improperly served the complaint. On a side note, Bank of America was served at their Plano, Texas Mail Center, and Bank of America concedes that this center is a regular place of business or activity. Also, I’ve served BoA dozens of times at that address and there were never any problems before.

On March 27, 2013, Judge Burr of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas denied Bank of America’s petition to strike or vacate the default judgment. The court’s opinion is here. Bank of America appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. On December 22, 2013, the Superior Court affirmed Judge Burr’s decision that the default judgment was proper. The Superior Court’s opinion is here.

The crux of Bank of America’s argument was that service of process was deficient in two regards. First, it claims that the “mail center” is not a person, but rather a place. This, despite the fact that a bank employee physically stamped the lawsuit papers as “received”, was not persuasive to the Superior Court. Second, Bank of America maintained that proper service requires a signed receipt, and the mail center’s stamp was not sufficient. This was also dismissed by the Superior Court as not persuasive.

As service of the lawsuit has been deemed proper by the Superior Court, the default judgment remains in place. It is unknown whether Bank of America will file an appeal.

Contact Shaffer & Gaier

To set up a free initial consultation, contact our office online or call our foreclosure hotline at 855-289-1660. Or call our office location in Philadelphia at 215-751-0100, or in New Jersey at 856-429-0970.

Our Services

img

Our Latest News Posts

Firm Newsletter: April 2019

Click here to download a printable pdf of this newsletter. Supreme Court Victory Leads to Arbitration Award It certainly seemed like a long-time coming, but our firm was successful in taking our client’s case all the way to the Pennsylvania … [Read More...]

Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injuries

Nearly 50,000 patients die annually from traumatic brain injuries. Now a new study led by the University of Pennsylvania reveals that tiny blood vessels in the brain can offer clues to better treatment, according to an article from UPI’s Health … [Read More...]